Why separate mic and call audio?
Many tools blend your voice and everyone else’s into one track, then try to guess who spoke. Keeping the tracks separate makes labels more reliable on remote calls.
You get cleaner “who said what” on Zoom-style meetings, especially when people speak at the same time, which makes quotes and follow-ups easier.
What it means in practice
- Your mic and the call’s sound stay on separate channels when possible.
- “You” vs “them” is clearer than a single mixed track.
- You still attach names so familiar people stay labeled next time.
When it helps most
- People speak at the same time, and a mixed track cannot separate the halves.
- You and one guest are the whole call, so two channels answer the question outright.
- Someone on the call has a voice close to yours.
It does not help in a room. There, every voice arrives on the same microphone, so the labels come from the voices themselves. That is the harder case, and it is why naming people once is worth it.
FAQ
- What is channel-aware diarisation?
- Keeping your microphone and the call’s sound on separate channels so “you” and “them” stay clearer on video calls.
- Does this replace naming speakers?
- It helps separate voices. You still attach names so people stay recognizable next meeting.
- Does this work for in-person recordings?
- No. Separate channels only exist on a call, where your mic and the call audio are two different sources. In a room, yapyap labels voices from the audio itself.
Record your meetings. See who spoke. Turn one recording into the write-up you need, on your computer, with no cloud account.
Free to try. No card, no account.
Then €69, once. Yours forever, every update included.
Your recordings never leave your computer.